María Sabina: the Mazatec healer and the cost of the West’s discovery

María Sabina was a Mazatec healer, a sabia or “wise woman”, from Huautla de Jiménez in the mountains of Oaxaca, Mexico. Her name is known around the world because of one night in June 1955, when she led a vigil, a velada, that an American banker, R. Gordon Wasson, attended and then described in Life magazine in 1957.

Her story is often told as a discovery. Many scholars since, including Mazatec researchers, describe something closer to a loss. This article sets out who she was, what a velada is, what Wasson’s visit set in motion, and what is still argued about, including whether the Mazatec people were ever properly credited or repaid. We link each claim to a source we opened, and we say where we could read only a summary or a secondary account.

Who was María Sabina?

Wikidata records her birth in Huautla de Jiménez on 22 July 1894 and her death there in 1985 (Wikidata). A scholarly bibliography gives her years as 1895 to 1985 (Spiers et al., 2024). We cannot settle the birth year, so we say the mid-1890s. That bibliography describes a sabia raised in a mushroom-using home and community in Huautla, who called the mushrooms “saint children” (Spiers et al., 2024).

One of her few widely quoted statements, from the life story she told, is that “the mushrooms are saints; they give me wisdom” (Seale-Feldman, 2026, quoting Estrada). The words come to us through interviews, translation and quotation. See the section below on her own voice.

The main biography is by Álvaro Estrada, a Mazatec writer and journalist from Huautla who interviewed her in Mazatec (Spiers et al., 2024). Catalogue records show a Spanish edition, Vida de María Sabina: la sabia de los hongos, published in Mexico in 1977 (Spanish edition record), and an English translation by Henry Munn with a retrospective essay by Wasson, published in Santa Barbara in 1981 (English edition record). We checked these records only. We did not read either book.

What is a velada?

A velada is a night vigil. In the account Wasson published, it was a gathering with a purpose: people consulted the mushrooms about illness, a stolen donkey or a relative far away. He added that the Mazatec people he met treated the mushrooms as sacred, never sold them in the market, and called their use muy delicado, a Spanish phrase meaning perilous (Life, 1957).

His description of the 1955 night is of an evening gathering of about 20 people, an altar table with Christian images, resin incense, a candle snuffed out before midnight, and a healer chanting in the dark until dawn, with an invocation in the name of Christ and the saints. He wrote that the Mazatec blended Christian and older religious elements (Life, 1957).

That is one visitor’s account of one night, written by an outsider with a theory of his own. Wasson believed psychoactive mushrooms lay at the origin of religion, and scholars say his portrait cast María Sabina as a living relic of an ancient rite and paid little attention to her as a person (Spiers et al., 2024). It is not a full description of Mazatec practice.

What happened when Gordon Wasson visited in 1955?

The Wassons had first travelled to Huautla in August 1953, with their daughter and the anthropologist Robert Weitlaner, where they were received by a bilingual teacher, Herlinda Martínez Cid (García de Teresa, 2022). The velada with María Sabina followed on the night of 29–30 June 1955. Wasson and the photographer Allan Richardson attended (Life, 1957).

Two years later, “Seeking the Magic Mushroom” ran in Life on 13 May 1957. It gave her a pseudonym, “Eva Mendez”, and captioned the photographs with it (Life, 1957). It did not name the town (Haro-Luna et al., 2025). The same year the Wassons published a book, and Valentina Wasson wrote a piece for This Week magazine six days after the Life article; it was the Life article that brought the subject to mass attention in the West (Spiers et al., 2024). We tell the wider story in our history of magic mushrooms.

Wasson wrote that he and Richardson were “the first white men in recorded history to eat the divine mushrooms” (Life, 1957). Scholars disagree. Spiers and colleagues point out that earlier researchers had already reached the Mazatec highlands and conclude that Wasson was less of a pioneer than he often claimed (Spiers et al., 2024). They also note that Valentina Wasson is credited with inspiring her husband’s interest in mycology.

One source reports, citing the Wassons’ own book, that Wasson paid María Sabina 50 pesos for the 1955 velada, a little more than her usual fee of 20 pesos (García de Teresa, 2022). We did not open that book.

What happened to María Sabina and her community afterwards?

The sources we read agree on the outline and differ on the details. Gerber and colleagues write that the pseudonym was dropped, and her identity revealed, in the Wassons’ 1957 book (Gerber et al., 2021). Magar and colleagues write that Wasson’s publications revealed her identity and location and brought a wave of outsiders to her community, disrupting local life and leading to her ostracisation (Magar et al., 2026).

The Life article led many people to travel to the Sierra Mazateca. In the first half of the 1960s, visitors arrived in Huautla without major trouble, and a Mexican journalist’s 1964 book about his ceremonies with her added to her fame. In those years she held ceremonies at a hotel for a fee (García de Teresa, 2022). By the mid-1960s Huautla had become a countercultural pilgrimage destination, and she was stigmatised in her own community for the changes that followed (Spiers et al., 2024).

Government officials and conservative sectors of the community held her responsible for incidents involving foreign visitors, and her house was burned down on several occasions (García de Teresa, 2022). Another paper says she was briefly jailed and her house set on fire, and adds that details vary between accounts (Gerber et al., 2021). We could not find a primary record of the arrest, so we report it as one source’s statement.

The state also acted against the visitors. In September 1967 the Ministry of the Interior sent judicial police and immigration agents to Huautla and 32 Americans were deported. A 1969 operation by the attorney general’s office, with soldiers in helicopters, captured 15 people, nine of them Mexican (García de Teresa, 2022). The article dates Mexico’s listing of psilocybin mushrooms as illicit to 1971, with traditional ceremonial use tolerated. The 1971 UN convention is covered in our history article.

The shift was cultural as well as legal. A study of a Zapotec community, drawing on earlier work, says the publicity displaced ceremonial use and allowed recreational use to spread (Haro-Luna et al., 2025). Today the mushroom tourism that exists in Huautla is a modest income for a few families (García de Teresa, 2022).

She died in 1985 (Wikidata). Retellings add dramatic detail about her family and her last years. We left out anything we could not trace to a source we opened.

What did María Sabina say herself?

Less than the internet suggests, and with a chain of translation in between. Estrada interviewed her in Mazatec (Spiers et al., 2024), and the words we can read have passed through Spanish and English and were then quoted by other scholars. We opened neither book. The words we could verify through such papers are these.

• She called the mushrooms saints, and said they gave her wisdom (Seale-Feldman, 2026).
• One paper, quoting the Spanish edition, has her saying that a wise person should not charge for her services or profit from her wisdom (García de Teresa, 2022). The same paper notes that she did take payment for ceremonies in the 1960s, so the sources do not tell a simple story.

Many other quotations attributed to her circulate online, often about what the visitors did to the mushrooms and to her town. We did not include any we could not trace to a source we opened and read.

Who gets the credit, and who was harmed?

The questions that have grown around her case are about credit, consent and benefit.

• Credit for the “discovery”. The practice was never lost to the people who held it, and earlier outsiders had been there before Wasson (Spiers et al., 2024).
• Consent and confidentiality. Three papers say Wasson published about her without her consent, or after promising confidentiality (Magar et al., 2026; Gerber et al., 2021; Mycological Society of America committee, 2025). We could not read a primary account of what was agreed. Life did use a pseudonym and left the town unnamed.
• Reparations and benefit. Spiers and colleagues report that Mazatec researchers have criticised the exploitation María Sabina and her people suffered and called for reparations. Gerber and colleagues, including an author affiliated with an archive of Mazatec histories in Huautla, argue that the Mazatec are not party to psilocybin patent processes and that no one has sought reciprocity with the community (Gerber et al., 2021). That was their position in 2021, and it is an argument, not a legal finding.
• Current standards. Magar and colleagues call for consent procedures, benefit-sharing agreements and Indigenous leadership in psychedelic research (Magar et al., 2026). The Mycological Society of America renamed its “Gordon and Tina Wasson Award” the “Community Mycologist Award” because of concerns that the Wassons’ actions harmed Indigenous communities and breached research ethics (Mycological Society of America committee, 2025).
• Mazatec voices. The linguistic anthropologist Paja Faudree describes Mazatec authors working to manage a “representational hangover” from outsiders’ accounts (Faudree, 2015).

Wasson himself later wrote, according to one study, that he had nightmares about having unleashed a commercial exploitation of the vilest kind on Huautla (García de Teresa, 2022). The same study argues that commerce and sacred use were not necessarily opposites, and notes that payment for healers long predates the visitors. The disagreement is over how to read the same history.

What is disputed, and how sure are we?

Her case matters beyond Oaxaca. When people talk about psilocybin research today, in our guide to what psilocybin is or the trial evidence on depression, they are building on knowledge that came, in part, from Mazatec people and from a night in Huautla. Where research is heading, and who shares in it, is not settled.

Shroomverse sells mushroom products. This article is general information about history. It is not medical, legal or purchasing advice, and it does not encourage anyone to use drugs.