shroomverse
The Shroomverse alien on a cedar forest path in Japan beside a small red wooden shrine gate.

SPECIES ATLAS · PSILOCYBE

Psilocybe subcaerulipes

Named by Hongo, 1958

Psilocybin record: reported (one or older reports)

A history of a name and a chemistry record, not an identification guide. No name, picture or description can show that a wild mushroom is safe, and poisonous mushrooms are mistaken for magic mushrooms. If someone may have eaten a wild mushroom, call a poison centre without waiting for symptoms: 1-844-POISON-X in most of Canada, 1-800-463-5060 in Quebec. Call 911 if they’re unconscious, not breathing or having a seizure.

How it was named.

Hongo described Psilocybe subcaerulipes in 1958 in the Journal of Japanese Botany 33: 44, from Honshu. Yokoyama's 1976 P. argentipes, the subject of the first Japanese psilocybin isolation, is now treated by Index Fungorum as the same species.

Named
Hongo, 1958
Other names in the records
Psilocybe argentipes K. Yokoy. (1976), Psilocybe taiwanensis Zhu L. Yang & Guzmán (per GBIF), Psilocybe thaizapoteca Guzmán, Karun. & Ram.-Guill. (per GBIF)
Type specimen
Honshu, Japan (Index Fungorum: anon., 2 Jun. 1957, 'type'). (Index Fungorum record, Psilocybe subcaerulipes; pin = Wikidata coordinates (Q13989))
The pin marks the type locality at the level of detail the record gives: one historical collection, not a range or a place to look. Land outlines: Natural Earth.

The psilocybin record.

Every analysis we could verify, oldest first, including results that found nothing. No amounts are given: they vary between collections and this is not a potency guide.

  1. 1981

    Reported Psilocybin isolated from P. argentipes, and determined in specimens of some other mushrooms; Bradshaw Table S1 lists the paper for both names

    Method: HPLC. Koike et al. 1981, J. Nat. Prod. 44: 362-365 (Crossref metadata; text not read)

What the record doesn’t show: The single analysis was published under the synonym P. argentipes, and its text was not read.

Records on file.

GBIF, the global biodiversity database, held 85 occurrence records under this name, 0 of them from Canada, when we checked on October 25, 2026. Records include unverified observations and old misidentifications, so counts show where people have recorded the name, not where it grows.

See the name on GBIF

Sources

Compiled from the sources above; last checked .

Save to Pinterest