shroomverse
The Shroomverse alien in flat green Dutch pastures beside a canal and a windmill.

SPECIES ATLAS · PSILOCYBE

Psilocybe liniformans

Named by Guzmán & Bas, 1977

Psilocybin record: reported (older analyses only)

A history of a name and a chemistry record, not an identification guide. No name, picture or description can show that a wild mushroom is safe, and poisonous mushrooms are mistaken for magic mushrooms. If someone may have eaten a wild mushroom, call a poison centre without waiting for symptoms: 1-844-POISON-X in most of Canada, 1-800-463-5060 in Quebec. Call 911 if they’re unconscious, not breathing or having a seizure.

How it was named.

Guzmán and Bas described Psilocybe liniformans in 1977 in Persoonia 9(2): 233, from the Netherlands. In 1980 Guzmán and Stamets added var. americana from Washington State (Mycotaxon 11(2): 480), which Index Fungorum now places under the species.

Named
Guzmán & Bas, 1977
Other names in the records
Psilocybe liniformans var. americana Guzmán & Stamets (1980)
Type specimen
Netherlands (Index Fungorum). The variety americana was described from Washington, USA. (Index Fungorum record, Psilocybe liniformans; pin = Wikidata coordinates (Q55))
The pin marks the type locality at the level of detail the record gives: one historical collection, not a range or a place to look. Land outlines: Natural Earth.

The psilocybin record.

Every analysis we could verify, oldest first, including results that found nothing. No amounts are given: they vary between collections and this is not a potency guide.

  1. 1980

    Reported Psilocybin reported in var. americana (Beug & Bigwood, in Stamets et al. 1980)

    Method: TLC (per Bradshaw Table S1). Guzmán 1983, The Genus Psilocybe (Beih. Nova Hedwigia 74), Table 11, archive.org scan

  2. 1985

    Reported Psilocybin reported; Bradshaw Table S1 assigns this species to Stijve & Kuyper's survey of more than 100 European fungi, which found psilocybin in three Psilocybe species

    Method: HPLC and TLC. Stijve & Kuyper 1985, Planta Med. 51: 385-387 (abstract)

What the record doesn’t show: Both reports are from the 1980s and were read only through reviews and an abstract that does not name the species.

Records on file.

GBIF, the global biodiversity database, held 145 occurrence records under this name, 0 of them from Canada, when we checked on October 25, 2026. Records include unverified observations and old misidentifications, so counts show where people have recorded the name, not where it grows.

See the name on GBIF

Sources

Compiled from the sources above; last checked .

Save to Pinterest