
THE SHROOMVERSE JOURNAL ✳ 16 MIN READ
Driving after magic mushrooms in Ontario: the federal rule and provincial penalties
Topic: Law and policy in Canada
Published Updated
Short answer, checked 17 October 2026
Canada’s law does not use the term “DUI”, but driving after magic mushrooms can be a criminal offence in two ways. It is an offence to operate a vehicle while impaired to any degree by a drug. Separately, the Blood Drug Concentration Regulations set the prohibited level for psilocybin and psilocin at “any detectable level” in the blood within two hours of driving. Both offences carry mandatory minimums, starting with a $1,000 fine for a first offence, and a court must order a driving prohibition. In Ontario, police can also suspend a licence at the roadside for 7 to 90 days and impound the vehicle, before any court case. This is a reference, not legal advice.
On this page 9 sections
Is driving on shrooms a DUI? “DUI” is an American term. In Canada the offence is impaired driving, and it sits in Part VIII.1 of the Criminal Code. This guide sets out the federal rule for psilocybin, how police test for drugs and the court penalties, then what Ontario adds under its Highway Traffic Act. It reports law. It does not predict what would happen in any case.
Not legal advice
This article is a neutral summary of statutes and official government pages, read on 17 October 2026. It is not legal advice, and it cannot tell you how the law applies to any real situation. If you have been charged or had your licence suspended, speak to a lawyer. If someone is in danger, call 911. The Ontario Poison Centre is on 1-800-268-9017, 24 hours a day. For crisis support, call or text 9-8-8. For more, see our safety page.
Is driving on shrooms a criminal offence in Canada?
Yes, it can be. Section 320.14(1) of the Criminal Code says everyone commits an offence who “operates a conveyance while the person’s ability to operate it is impaired to any degree by alcohol or a drug or by a combination of alcohol and a drug” (Criminal Code, s. 320.14). The words “to any degree” matter. The Crown does not have to show that someone was badly impaired, only that their ability was impaired to some degree.
“Operate” is defined widely. For a motor vehicle it means “to drive it or to have care or control of it”. A “conveyance” means a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment (Criminal Code, s. 320.11). So the offence is not limited to cars on the road. Ontario’s driver’s handbook puts it plainly: “Your vehicle does not have to be moving; you can be charged if you are impaired behind the wheel, even if you have not started to drive” (MTO Driver’s Handbook).

Possession is a separate matter, covered in our guide to psilocybin penalties in Canada. The driving offences apply whether or not anyone is charged with possession, in every province (Criminal Code, s. 320.14).
What is the legal limit for psilocybin while driving?
There is no tolerance level. Section 320.14(1)(c) makes it a separate offence to have, “within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood drug concentration that is equal to or exceeds the blood drug concentration for the drug that is prescribed by regulation” (Criminal Code, s. 320.14). This offence does not require proof of impairment.
The Blood Drug Concentration Regulations prescribe those levels. Section 2 lists ten drugs. For psilocybin (item 3) and psilocin (item 4), the prescribed concentration is “Any detectable level”. LSD, PCP, 6-monoacetylmorphine, ketamine, cocaine and methamphetamine are also set at any detectable level. THC and GHB have numeric limits instead (Blood Drug Concentration Regulations). The Department of Justice confirms that any detectable amount of psilocybin or psilocin within two hours of driving is prohibited (Department of Justice).
Why “any detectable level”? The government’s regulatory statement says those levels “were recommended by the DDC as any presence of these drugs in the body is inconsistent with safe driving”. The DDC is the Drugs and Driving Committee of the Canadian Society of Forensic Science, which the statement describes as the government’s scientific advisor on drugs and driving (Canada Gazette, Part II, 2018). We did not review the committee’s underlying report.
Section 320.14(6) sets out a narrow exception. No offence is committed under paragraph (1)(c) if the person consumed the drug after ceasing to operate the conveyance and, after ceasing to operate it, “had no reasonable expectation that they would be required to provide a sample of a bodily substance” (Criminal Code, s. 320.14). It does not apply to the impairment offence. How long psilocybin or psilocin stays detectable is a separate question, covered in how long shrooms stay in your system. None of our sources gives a time after which driving is safe or lawful, and nothing here should be read that way.
How do police test drivers for drugs such as psilocybin?
Roadside screening
Under section 320.27(1), if a peace officer has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person has a drug in their body and has operated a conveyance within the preceding three hours, the officer can demand that the person immediately perform physical coordination tests, provide a sample of a bodily substance for analysis by “approved drug screening equipment”, or both (Criminal Code, s. 320.27). The prescribed coordination tests are the standard field sobriety tests: the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk-and-turn test and the one-leg stand test (Evaluation of Impaired Operation Regulations, s. 2).
Two devices are approved as drug screening equipment: the Dräger DrugTest 5000 and the Abbott SoToxa (Approved Drug Screening Equipment Order). The government’s regulatory statements say the Dräger device tests oral fluid for THC and cocaine (Canada Gazette, 2018), and that the SoToxa was recommended for the detection of THC. They also say that, to be approved in Canada, screening equipment “must detect one or more of THC, cocaine and methamphetamine” (Canada Gazette, 2019). The Department of Justice adds that oral fluid screeners cannot detect all impairing drugs and that police have other tools (Department of Justice, FAQ). We found no approved roadside screener described as detecting psilocybin or psilocin.
Drug recognition evaluations and blood samples
A roadside screener is not the only route. Under section 320.28(2), if an officer has reasonable grounds to believe a person drove while impaired by a drug, or committed a blood drug concentration offence, the officer can demand an evaluation by an “evaluating officer”, blood samples, or both (Criminal Code, s. 320.28). The evaluating officer must be a certified drug recognition expert accredited by the International Association of Chiefs of Police. The evaluation includes eye examinations, divided-attention tests and checks of vital signs and pupils (Evaluation of Impaired Operation Regulations, ss. 1 and 3).
If the evaluation gives the officer reasonable grounds to believe a type of drug is impairing the person, the officer identifies the type and can demand an oral fluid, urine or blood sample. The listed types include “a hallucinogen” (Criminal Code, s. 320.28(4) and (5)). The Department of Justice notes that blood samples are required to prove the blood drug concentration offences (Department of Justice, FAQ). Failing or refusing to comply with any of these demands without reasonable excuse is itself an offence (Criminal Code, s. 320.15).
What are the federal penalties, including mandatory minimums?
Impaired driving and the psilocybin blood drug offence fall under section 320.14(1), and section 320.19(1) sets the same penalties for both. They are hybrid offences, so the Crown can proceed by indictment or summarily. Unlike the drug possession offences, these sections still carry mandatory minimum punishments in the current consolidation (Criminal Code, s. 320.19).
| Offence | Maximum | Mandatory minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Impaired operation, or a prohibited blood drug level (s. 320.14(1); penalty in s. 320.19(1)) | 10 years by indictment; on summary conviction, a fine up to $5,000, up to two years less a day, or both | First offence: $1,000 fine. Second: 30 days in prison. Each later offence: 120 days |
| Refusing or failing to comply with a demand (s. 320.15(1); penalty in s. 320.19(1) and (4)) | Same as above | First offence: $2,000 fine. Second: 30 days. Each later offence: 120 days |
| Causing bodily harm (s. 320.14(2); penalty in s. 320.2) | 14 years by indictment; summary maximum as above | Same escalating minimums: $1,000, 30 days, 120 days |
| Causing death (s. 320.14(3); penalty in s. 320.21) | Life imprisonment (indictment only) | Same escalating minimums: $1,000, 30 days, 120 days |
Sources for the table: s. 320.19, s. 320.2 and s. 320.21. On top of any sentence, a court that finds someone guilty under section 320.14(1) or 320.15(1) “shall” order a driving prohibition. For a first offence it lasts one to three years, plus any prison term. For a second offence it is two to ten years, and for each later offence at least three years, again plus any prison term (Criminal Code, s. 320.24).

There is one route around the minimums. With the consent of the prosecutor and the offender, a court may delay sentencing so the offender can attend a treatment program approved by the province. If the offender completes it, the court is not required to impose the minimum punishment or the prohibition order, but it cannot grant a discharge (Criminal Code, s. 320.23). What courts actually impose in psilocybin driving cases is not something we sourced.
What happens to your licence in Ontario at the roadside?
Ontario adds administrative penalties under its Highway Traffic Act. They take effect at the roadside, without a conviction, and a person has “no right to be heard” before them. A suspension “does not constitute an alternative to any proceeding or penalty arising from the same circumstances”, so a criminal case can follow as well (Highway Traffic Act, ss. 48.0.1, 48.3 and 48.3.1).
- Short-term suspension (s. 48.0.1). If an officer, after physical coordination tests, reasonably believes a driver’s ability is impaired by a drug, the licence is suspended for 7 days for a first suspension, 14 days for a second and 30 days for a third or later. Suspensions more than 10 years old do not count (Highway Traffic Act).
- 90-day suspension (s. 48.3.1). If a driver has been evaluated by an evaluating officer under section 320.28(2) of the Criminal Code and the officer reasonably believes the driver was impaired by a drug, the licence is suspended for 90 days. The evaluating officer’s determination governs whether a short-term suspension continues or ends (Highway Traffic Act).
- 90-day suspension for refusal (s. 48.3). Failing or refusing a demand under section 320.27 or 320.28 to provide a sample of breath, blood, oral fluid or urine, perform coordination tests or submit to an evaluation also leads to a 90-day suspension (Highway Traffic Act).
- Vehicle impoundment (s. 48.4). When a 90-day suspension is triggered under section 48.3 or 48.3.1, the vehicle is impounded for seven days, at the owner’s cost and risk (Highway Traffic Act).
Ontario’s impaired-driving page lists what comes with these suspensions. For drivers who fail a standard field sobriety test, a first time brings a 7-day suspension, an 8-hour education course and a $250 penalty. For drivers who “perform poorly during a Drug Recognition Expert evaluation”, or who fail or refuse a testing demand, a first time brings an immediate 90-day suspension, a 7-day impoundment, an 8-hour education course and a $550 penalty. Repeat occurrences add a 16-hour treatment program, and a third adds an ignition interlock condition for six months. A licence reinstatement fee is charged each time (Ontario, Impaired driving).
What happens in Ontario after a criminal conviction?
Ontario’s page says some penalties changed on 1 July 2026. For a criminal conviction for impaired driving, it lists the following provincial consequences, in addition to the court’s fines and any jail time (Ontario, Impaired driving):
- First conviction: licence suspension of at least one year, a mandatory education or treatment program, and an ignition interlock device for at least one year.
- Second conviction within 10 years: suspension of at least three years, a mandatory program, and interlock for at least three years.
- Third conviction within 10 years: lifetime suspension, which may be reduced after 10 years if certain criteria are met, a mandatory program, interlock for at least six years and a mandatory medical evaluation.
- Fourth conviction within 10 years: lifetime suspension, with no possibility of reduction.
- Impaired driving causing death: lifetime suspension, which may be reduced after 25 years if certain criteria are met.
After the interlock condition is removed, the page says a driver is subject to a minimum six-month “P” condition, “meaning you must have no alcohol and no drugs in your system when you drive” (Ontario, Impaired driving). The remedial program is Back on Track, which the driver’s handbook describes as mandatory “for all drivers convicted of impaired, driving-related Criminal Code offences”. A suspended licence stays suspended until the remedial requirements are complete (MTO Driver’s Handbook).
The ignition interlock device itself is “an in-car alcohol breath screening device”, so it tests for alcohol, not drugs. Ontario applies the program to drivers convicted of an impaired driving offence under the Criminal Code, and to drivers suspended three or more times within 10 years for impaired driving (Ontario, Ignition Interlock Program). The page describes a reduced-suspension option, but only for first- or second-time offenders “convicted of alcohol impaired driving”.
What about young, novice and commercial drivers in Ontario?
Ontario has a zero-tolerance drug rule for some drivers. Section 44.2 of the Highway Traffic Act makes it a condition of the licence of every novice driver, and every young driver (under 22), “that there be no drug in his or her body, as indicated by approved drug screening equipment, while he or she is driving a motor vehicle on a highway”. There is an exception for drivers legally authorized to use a drug for medical purposes. On conviction, the fine is $60 to $500, and a young driver’s licence is suspended for 30 days (Highway Traffic Act, s. 44.2). Ontario’s page, covering G1, G2, M1 and M2 holders and drivers 21 and under, lists 7- to 30-day roadside suspensions, programs, penalties of $250 to $450 and a $60 to $1,000 fine on conviction, without separating alcohol from drugs (Ontario, Impaired driving).
Commercial drivers face their own zero-tolerance rule, with 3-day suspensions (Ontario, Impaired driving). Ontario’s cannabis page describes the zero-tolerance rule as applying to cannabis “as detected by a federally approved drug screening device” (Ontario, Cannabis and driving). How the rule applies to psilocybin is not clear from what we read (see below). Ontario’s page says young and novice drivers also “can face the impaired driving penalties like any other fully licenced drivers”.
What is still unsettled?
- Settled by the text: the section 320.14 offences, the “any detectable level” standard, the federal minimums and Ontario’s administrative suspensions, as of the dates above.
- How Ontario’s zero-tolerance drug condition applies to psilocybin. Section 44.2 ties it to what “approved drug screening equipment” indicates, and the regulatory definition in force is in a regulation we did not read. The federally approved screeners were approved for THC and cocaine (Canada Gazette, 2018; Canada Gazette, 2019) (unresolved).
- What courts actually impose in psilocybin driving cases, and how often these cases arise in Ontario. We found no figures specific to psilocybin (unresolved).
- The exact effect of the 1 July 2026 Ontario changes on someone whose offence date came earlier. Ontario’s pages mention transition rules (Ontario, Ignition Interlock Program); check them directly.
- How the law applies to any specific situation. That is a question for a lawyer.
Ontario’s own advice for avoiding impaired driving is to plan another way home, such as a designated driver, transit, a ride or staying overnight (Ontario, Impaired driving). For the wider legal picture, read whether magic mushrooms are legal in Ontario. For combined use, see mixing magic mushrooms with alcohol, cannabis and other drugs. Check the Justice Laws and e-Laws pages before relying on any figure here, because the law can change after the date above.
Common questions
Is driving on shrooms a DUI in Canada?
Canadian law does not use the term DUI. Under section 320.14(1) of the Criminal Code, it is an offence to operate a vehicle while impaired to any degree by a drug, and a separate offence to have a prohibited blood drug concentration within two hours of driving. For psilocybin and psilocin, the prohibited level is any detectable level.
Is any amount of psilocybin in the blood illegal for drivers?
The Blood Drug Concentration Regulations set the level for psilocybin and psilocin at “any detectable level” within two hours of ceasing to operate a vehicle. Proof of impairment is not needed for that offence. Section 320.14(6) sets out a narrow exception for a drug consumed after driving.
Can a roadside saliva test detect magic mushrooms?
The two approved roadside oral fluid screeners were approved for THC and cocaine (Dräger DrugTest 5000) and THC (Abbott SoToxa), according to the Canada Gazette. Police can also demand a drug recognition evaluation, whose listed drug types include hallucinogens, and then oral fluid, urine or blood samples.
What is the minimum penalty for drug-impaired driving in Canada?
Section 320.19 sets a mandatory minimum $1,000 fine for a first offence, 30 days in prison for a second and 120 days for each later offence. The maximum is 10 years by indictment. A court must also order a driving prohibition of one to three years for a first offence, plus any prison term.
What is the penalty for drug-impaired driving in Ontario at the roadside?
Under the Highway Traffic Act, a driver an officer believes is drug-impaired after coordination tests faces a 7-, 14- or 30-day suspension. After a drug recognition evaluation, or for refusing a demand, it is 90 days plus a seven-day vehicle impoundment. Ontario also lists penalties of $250 to $550, education or treatment programs and reinstatement fees.
Do Ontario’s zero-tolerance rules for G1 and G2 drivers cover drugs?
Yes. Section 44.2 of the Highway Traffic Act makes it a licence condition for novice drivers and drivers under 22 that there be no drug in the body, as indicated by approved drug screening equipment. Commercial drivers have a similar rule. These drivers also face all the general impaired-driving penalties.
Is this article legal advice?
No. It summarizes statutes and official government pages as read on 17 October 2026. For a charge or a suspension, speak to a lawyer. For emergencies, call 911 and see our safety page.
Shroomverse sells mushroom products. This article is general information about Canadian drug law. It is not medical, legal or purchasing advice, and it does not encourage anyone to use drugs.
SOURCES
- Criminal Code, section 320.14 (operation while impaired; blood drug concentration offences), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Act current to 2026-09-30, last amended 2026-07-18. Supports the wording of s. 320.14(1)(a) and (c), the bodily harm and death offences in (2) and (3), and the drug exception in (6).
- Criminal Code, section 320.11 (definitions for Part VIII.1), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the definitions of “operate”, “conveyance”, “approved drug screening equipment” and “evaluating officer”.
- Blood Drug Concentration Regulations (SOR/2018-148), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Current to 2026-09-30, last amended 2018-12-18. Supports that section 2 prescribes “Any detectable level” for psilocybin (item 3) and psilocin (item 4), and the other listed drugs and levels.
- Blood Drug Concentration Regulations, SOR/2018-148, with Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement, Canada Gazette, Part II, Vol. 152, No. 14 (11 July 2018). Accessed . Supports that the “any detectable level” standard for magic mushrooms was recommended by the Drugs and Driving Committee because any presence is inconsistent with safe driving, and the committee’s advisory role.
- Criminal Code, section 320.27 (testing for presence of alcohol or drug), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the reasonable-suspicion demand for coordination tests and a bodily substance sample on approved drug screening equipment within three hours of operating.
- Criminal Code, section 320.28 (evaluations and samples), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the demand for an evaluation by an evaluating officer or blood samples, the follow-up oral fluid, urine or blood sample, and the list of drug types including hallucinogens.
- Evaluation of Impaired Operation (Drugs and Alcohol) Regulations (SOR/2008-196), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the three standard field sobriety tests, that an evaluating officer must be a certified drug recognition expert accredited by the IACP, and the steps of the evaluation.
- Approved Drug Screening Equipment Order (SOR/2018-179), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Current to 2026-09-30, last amended 2019-06-24. Supports that the Dräger DrugTest 5000 and the Abbott SoToxa are the approved drug screening equipment.
- Approved Drug Screening Equipment Order: SOR/2018-179, Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement, Canada Gazette, Part II (5 September 2018). Accessed . Supports that the Dräger device tests oral fluid for THC and cocaine, and that approved equipment must detect one or more of THC, cocaine and methamphetamine.
- Order Amending the Approved Drug Screening Equipment Order (proposed), Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement, Canada Gazette, Part I, Vol. 153, No. 16 (20 April 2019). Accessed . Supports that the SoToxa was recommended for the detection of THC and repeats the THC, cocaine and methamphetamine approval requirement.
- Criminal Code, section 320.15 (failure or refusal to comply with demand), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports that failing or refusing a demand under s. 320.27 or 320.28 without reasonable excuse is an offence.
- Criminal Code, section 320.19 (punishment), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the maximums, the mandatory minimums ($1,000, 30 days, 120 days) and the $2,000 minimum fine for a first refusal.
- Criminal Code, section 320.2 (punishment in case of bodily harm), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the 14-year maximum by indictment and the escalating minimums.
- Criminal Code, section 320.21 (punishment in case of death), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the maximum of life imprisonment and the escalating minimums.
- Criminal Code, section 320.23 (delay of sentencing), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the delayed sentencing for a provincially approved treatment program and the exception to the minimum punishment and prohibition order.
- Criminal Code, section 320.24 (prohibition orders), Department of Justice Canada, Justice Laws website. Accessed . Supports the mandatory prohibition order and its periods for first, second and later offences.
- Impaired Driving Laws, Department of Justice Canada. Accessed . Date modified 2022-03-03. Supports the plain-language statement that any detectable amount of psilocybin or psilocin within two hours of driving is prohibited.
- Frequently Asked Questions: Drug-Impaired Driving Laws, Department of Justice Canada. Accessed . Date modified 2021-07-07. Supports that oral fluid screeners cannot detect all impairing drugs and that blood samples are required to prove the blood drug concentration offences.
- Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, sections 44.2, 48.0.1, 48.3, 48.3.1 and 48.4, Government of Ontario, e-Laws. Accessed . Currency date 14 October 2026 when first read; re-read in a browser on 24 October 2026 (currency date 21 October 2026); sections 44.2, 48.0.1, 48.3, 48.3.1 and 48.4 match what this article says. Supports the novice and young driver drug condition and fine, the 7/14/30-day and 90-day administrative suspensions, the refusal suspension, no right to be heard, and the seven-day impoundment.
- Impaired driving, Government of Ontario, Ministry of Transportation. Accessed . Updated 30 June 2026. Supports the roadside penalty amounts and programs, the post-conviction suspensions, interlock periods and “P” condition from 1 July 2026, and the young, novice and commercial driver rules.
- Cannabis and driving, Government of Ontario. Accessed . Updated 10 December 2025. Supports that the zero-tolerance rule applies to cannabis as detected by a federally approved drug screening device.
- Ignition Interlock Program, Government of Ontario, Ministry of Transportation. Accessed . Supports that the device is an alcohol breath screening device, who must join the program, and that the reduced-suspension option is for alcohol-impaired driving convictions.
- Official MTO Driver’s Handbook: Other ways to lose your licence, Government of Ontario, Ministry of Transportation. Accessed . Updated 26 August 2022. Supports that a vehicle need not be moving for a charge, and that Back on Track is mandatory after an impaired driving conviction.
CHANGES
- : Published.
- : Added source links beside figures and legal statements.
- : Re-read the Highway Traffic Act sections cited here (44.2, 48.0.1, 48.3, 48.3.1 and 48.4) in a browser; they match what this article says, so no wording changed.



